AMD EPYC 7501 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7501 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 7501 and the HiSilicon Kirin 925 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 7501 32 core processor released in Q3/2017 with the HiSilicon Kirin 925 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2014. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| AMD EPYC 7001 (12) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Naples (Zen) | Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| AMD EPYC 7502 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7501 is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz). The processor can compute 64 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7501 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 32 | Cores | 8 |
| 64 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) | A-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 2 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 7501, while the HiSilicon Kirin 925 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7501 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666 | Memory | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 170.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 64.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 126.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 7501 has a TDP of 180 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 925 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7501 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 180 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7501 has 64.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 925 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7501 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
| 2750 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
32C 64T @ 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7501
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7501
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7501
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7501
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7501
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7501
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7501 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
