AMD EPYC 72F3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 72F3 or Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 72F3 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 72F3 was released in Q1/2021. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 was released in Q3/2014. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon E5 (71) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) |
| 3 | Generation | 5 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | Haswell E |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 72F3 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 72F3 is 3.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) while the Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has 6 CPU cores and 12 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 is at 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 |
| 8 | Cores | 6 |
| 16 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 72F3 can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 supports up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 68.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2133 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 768 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 68.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 15.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 40 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 72F3 is 180 W, while the Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has a TDP of 52 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 |
| 180 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 52 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 200 W | TDP up | -- |
| 165 W | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 72F3 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 15.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 2011-3 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
| 2468 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 72F3 | Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
