AMD E-350 vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD E-350 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 655
AMD E-350 HiSilicon Kirin 655

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD E-350 and the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD E-350 2 core processor released in Q1/2011 with the HiSilicon Kirin 655 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2016.
AMD E (23) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4)
1 Generation 4
Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD E-350 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 655 clocks with 2.12 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD E-350 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 655
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.60 GHz A-Core 2.12 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD E-350 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 655
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

AMD Radeon HD 6310 GPU ARM Mali-T830 MP2
0.49 GHz GPU frequency 0.90 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
3 GPU Generation Midgard 4
40 nm Technology 28nm
2 Max. displays 2
1 Compute units 2
80 Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 6310 GPU ARM Mali-T830 MP2
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
Decode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the AMD E-350, while the HiSilicon Kirin 655 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD E-350 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 655
DDR3-1066 Memory LPDDR3-933
Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
8.5 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD E-350 has a TDP of 18 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 655 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD E-350 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 655
18 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD E-350 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 655 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 16 nm.

AMD E-350 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 655
32 nm Technology 16 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX ISA extensions --
BGA 413 Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems Android
Q1/2011 Release date Q2/2016
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD E-350 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 655 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD E-350 (79%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD E-350 (32%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
133 (79%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
168 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
252 (32%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
794 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz
79 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (77%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
50 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
93 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
399 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD E-350 AMD E-350
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz
116 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD E-350 HiSilicon Kirin 655
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD E-350Intel Celeron N3050 AMD E-350 vs Intel Celeron N3050
2. Intel Celeron J1900AMD E-350 Intel Celeron J1900 vs AMD E-350
3. AMD E-350Intel Atom Z3735F AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom Z3735F
4. Intel Celeron J1800AMD E-350 Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD E-350
5. AMD E-450AMD E-350 AMD E-450 vs AMD E-350
6. AMD E-350Intel Pentium N3700 AMD E-350 vs Intel Pentium N3700
7. AMD E-350Intel Celeron N2840 AMD E-350 vs Intel Celeron N2840
8. AMD E-350AMD E1-1200 AMD E-350 vs AMD E1-1200
9. Intel Atom D2550AMD E-350 Intel Atom D2550 vs AMD E-350
10. AMD E-350AMD Sempron 2650 AMD E-350 vs AMD Sempron 2650


back to index