AMD E-300 vs AMD C-50

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD E-300 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD C-50
AMD E-300 AMD C-50

CPU comparison

AMD E-300 or AMD C-50 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD E-300 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-300 was released in Q3/2011.

The AMD C-50 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD C-50 was released in Q1/2011.
AMD E (23) Family AMD C (6)
AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) CPU group AMD C (6)
1 Generation 1
Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture Ontario (Bobcat)
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD E-300 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD E-300 is 1.30 GHz while the AMD C-50 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD C-50 is at 1.00 GHz.
AMD E-300 Characteristic AMD C-50
2 Cores 2
2 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
1.30 GHz Frequency 1.00 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD E-300 Characteristic AMD C-50
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The AMD E-300 or AMD C-50 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
AMD Radeon HD 6310 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6250
0.49 GHz GPU frequency 0.28 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
3 GPU Generation 3
40 nm Technology 40 nm
2 Max. displays 2
1 Compute units 1
80 Shader 80
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory 1 GB
11 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
AMD Radeon HD 6310 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6250
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 Decode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD E-300 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 8.5 GB/s. The AMD C-50 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 8.5 GB/s.
AMD E-300 Characteristic AMD C-50
DDR3-1066 Memory DDR3-1066
Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
8.5 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 8.5 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD E-300 is 18 W, while the AMD C-50 has a TDP of 9 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD E-300 Characteristic AMD C-50
18 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 9 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD E-300 is manufactured in 32 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The AMD C-50 is manufactured in 40 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache.
AMD E-300 Characteristic AMD C-50
32 nm Technology 40 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a
BGA 413 Socket BGA 413
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems
Q3/2011 Release date Q1/2011
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD E-300 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD C-50 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD E-300 (100%)
AMD C-50 (86%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD E-300 (100%)
AMD C-50 (84%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
106 (100%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
91 (86%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
189 (100%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
162 (86%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz
79 (100%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
AMD Radeon HD 6250 @ 0.28 GHz
45 (57%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
627 (100%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
446 (71%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
78 (100%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
73 (94%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
33 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
42 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD E-300 AMD C-50
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron N2840AMD E-300 Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E-300
2. AMD E1-6010AMD E-300 AMD E1-6010 vs AMD E-300
3. AMD E-300Intel Celeron 1007U AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron 1007U
4. AMD C-50AMD A4-1200 AMD C-50 vs AMD A4-1200
5. AMD E-300Intel Core i5-3210M AMD E-300 vs Intel Core i5-3210M
6. AMD C-50AMD A6-3420M AMD C-50 vs AMD A6-3420M
7. AMD C-50Intel Celeron N2810 AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron N2810
8. Intel Core i5-4360UAMD C-50 Intel Core i5-4360U vs AMD C-50
9. Intel Celeron N2840AMD C-50 Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD C-50
10. Intel Core i3-3240TAMD C-50 Intel Core i3-3240T vs AMD C-50


back to index