AMD E2-3000 vs AMD Phenom II X4 820

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD E2-3000 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Phenom II X4 820
AMD E2-3000 AMD Phenom II X4 820

CPU comparison

AMD E2-3000 or AMD Phenom II X4 820 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD E2-3000 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.65 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD E2-3000 was released in Q3/2013.

The AMD Phenom II X4 820 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 820 was released in Q3/2009.
AMD E (23) Family AMD Phenom II (52)
AMD E2-3000 (4) CPU group AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23)
3 Generation 4
Llano (K10) Architecture Deneb (K10)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD E2-3000 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.65 GHz. The AMD Phenom II X4 820 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz.

AMD E2-3000 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X4 820
2 Cores 4
2 Threads 4
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? Yes
1.65 GHz Frequency 2.80 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD E2-3000 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X4 820
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

AMD Radeon HD 8280 GPU no iGPU
0.45 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
5 GPU Generation --
28 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
128 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.1 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 8280 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD E2-3000 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 820 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

AMD E2-3000 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X4 820
DDR3L-1600 Memory DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066
Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
12.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 4.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD E2-3000 has a TDP of 15 W, that of the AMD Phenom II X4 820 is 95 W.

AMD E2-3000 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X4 820
15 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 95 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD E2-3000 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD Phenom II X4 820 cache has a total of 4.00 MB.

AMD E2-3000 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X4 820
28 nm Technology 45 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a
-- Socket AM3
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2013 Release date Q3/2009
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD E2-3000 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Phenom II X4 820 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
AMD E2-3000 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 (0%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD E2-3000 (56%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
1177 (56%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
2106 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
361 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
1177 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
AMD Radeon HD 8280 @ 0.45 GHz
115 (100%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
74 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3000
2C 2T @ 1.65 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD Phenom II X4 820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz
284 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD E2-3000 AMD Phenom II X4 820
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Atom D2500AMD E2-3000 Intel Atom D2500 vs AMD E2-3000
2. AMD E2-3800AMD E2-3000 AMD E2-3800 vs AMD E2-3000
3. AMD Phenom II X4 820AMD Phenom II X4 925 AMD Phenom II X4 820 vs AMD Phenom II X4 925
4. Intel Pentium G2020AMD E2-3000 Intel Pentium G2020 vs AMD E2-3000
5. AMD FX-4300AMD Phenom II X4 820 AMD FX-4300 vs AMD Phenom II X4 820
6. Intel Core i3-3227UAMD E2-3000 Intel Core i3-3227U vs AMD E2-3000
7. Intel Atom E3845AMD E2-3000 Intel Atom E3845 vs AMD E2-3000
8. AMD E2-3000AMD A4-5000 AMD E2-3000 vs AMD A4-5000
9. AMD A8-5500BAMD E2-3000 AMD A8-5500B vs AMD E2-3000
10. Intel Pentium G2030AMD E2-3000 Intel Pentium G2030 vs AMD E2-3000


back to index