AMD E1-2500 vs Intel Celeron J1800
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD E1-2500 | Intel Celeron J1800 | |
CPU comparisonAMD E1-2500 or Intel Celeron J1800 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD E1-2500 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD E1-2500 was released in Q3/2013. The Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.58 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron J1800 was released in Q4/2013. |
||
| AMD E | Family | Intel Celeron |
| AMD E1/E2-2000 | CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 |
| 2 | Generation | 6 |
| Kabini (Jaguar) | Architecture | Bay Trail |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD E1-2500 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD E1-2500 is 1.40 GHz while the Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron J1800 is at --. |
||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.40 GHz | Frequency | 2.41 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 2.58 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.58 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe AMD E1-2500 or Intel Celeron J1800 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 8240 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.69 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo) | 0.79 GHz | |
| 5 | GPU Generation | 7 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 2 | Execution units | 4 |
| 128 | Shader | 32 |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 11.1 | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD E1-2500 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Celeron J1800 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| L2 Cache | ||
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 2.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 4 | |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD E1-2500 is 15 W, while the Intel Celeron J1800 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 15 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 10 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD E1-2500 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron J1800 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| -- | Socket | BGA 1170 |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q4/2013 |
| -- | Release price | 47 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 2.41 GHz (2.58 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
AMD E1-2500
AMD Radeon HD 8240 @ 0.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.41 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD E1-2500
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD E1-2500 | Intel Celeron J1800 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
