AMD A9-9425 vs AMD EPYC 7532

Last updated: 2024-04-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A9-9425		AMD EPYC 7532
CPU comparison AMD A9-9425 or AMD EPYC 7532 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD A9-9425 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD A9-9425 was released in Q2/2017. The AMD EPYC 7532 has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7532 was released in Q1/2020.

AMD A (112)	Family	AMD EPYC (129)
AMD A9-9000 (4)	CPU group	AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
4	Generation	2
Stoney Ridge (Excavator)	Architecture	Rome (Zen 2)
Mobile	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD A9-9425 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD A9-9425 is 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7532 has 32 CPU cores and 64 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7532 is at 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz).
AMD A9-9425	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7532
2	Cores	32
2	Threads	64
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	No
3.10 GHz	Frequency	2.40 GHz
3.70 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	3.30 GHz
3.10 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	2.90 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD A9-9425	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7532
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The AMD A9-9425 or AMD EPYC 7532 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	GPU	no iGPU
0.85 GHz	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
7	GPU Generation	--
28 nm	Technology
3	Max. displays
3	Compute units	--
192	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
2 GB	Max. GPU Memory	--
12	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	GPU	no iGPU
Decode	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
Decode	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode	Codec h264	No
Decode	Codec VP9	No
Decode	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	No
Decode	Codec VC-1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD A9-9425 can use up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7532 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.
AMD A9-9425	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7532
DDR4-2133	Memory	DDR4-3200
8 GB	Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel)	Memory channels	8 (Octa Channel)
17.1 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
2.00 MB	L3 Cache	256.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	4.0
8	PCIe lanes	128
7.9 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	252.0 GB/s
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD A9-9425 is 15 W, while the AMD EPYC 7532 has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD A9-9425	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7532
15 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	200 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
25 W	TDP up	--
10 W	TDP down	--
90 °C	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD A9-9425 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7532 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache.
AMD A9-9425	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7532
28 nm	Technology	7 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
FP4	Socket	SP3
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2017	Release date	Q1/2020
--	Release price	3600 $

show more data		show more data

AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD A9-9425 (49%)

AMD EPYC 7532 (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD A9-9425 (3%)

AMD EPYC 7532 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.70 GHz	491 (47%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	1049 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	831 (3%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	24679 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.70 GHz	195 (51%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	386 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	1529 (3%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	54674 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	1246 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	12846 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	284 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	AMD A9-9425 AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) @ 0.85 GHz	325 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	4 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	299 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.70 GHz	82 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD A9-9425 2C 2T @ 3.10 GHz	141 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7532 32C 64T @ 2.90 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
AMD A9-9425	AMD EPYC 7532
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs AMD A9-9425
2.		AMD A9-9425 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
3.		Intel Core i3-7020U vs AMD A9-9425
4.		AMD A9-9425 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
5.		AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs AMD A9-9425
6.		AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs AMD A9-9425
7.		AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-1005G1
8.		AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-8145U
9.		AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-9100
10.		AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i5-8250U