Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A8-7600 vs AMD EPYC 7251
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A8-7600
63 %
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
AMD EPYC 7251
100 %
8C / 16T · 2.90 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A8-7600
31 %
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
AMD EPYC 7251
100 %
8C / 16T · 2.90 GHz
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Single-core performance
AMD A8-7600
48 %
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
AMD EPYC 7251
100 %
8C / 16T · 2.90 GHz
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Multi-core performance
AMD A8-7600
20 %
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
AMD EPYC 7251
100 %
8C / 16T · 2.90 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | AMD A8-7000 (6) | AMD EPYC 7001 (12) |
| Architecture | Kaveri (Steamroller) | Naples (Zen) |
| Technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Server |
| Socket | FM2+ | SP3 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 8x |
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.80 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.50 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 32.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 8 / 512 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2014 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-2133 (34.2 GB/s) | DDR4-2666 (153.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | ||
| Memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 128 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s | 126.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 120 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-7600 | AMD EPYC 7251 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q1/2014 | Q3/2017 |
| Release price | 450 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A8-7600 is 3.6 stars (16 ratings), while AMD EPYC 7251 has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD EPYC 7251
8C / 16T · 2.90 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
8
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
9
AMD A8-7600
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
