AMD A8-3820 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD A8-3820 | Samsung Exynos 9609 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD A8-3820 and the Samsung Exynos 9609 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD A8-3820 4 core processor released in Q4/2011 with the Samsung Exynos 9609 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD A (112) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
| AMD A8-3000 (4) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Llano (K10) | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD A8-3820 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (2.80 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 9609 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD A8-3820 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz (2.80 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6550D | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 3 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 5 | Compute units | 3 |
| 400 | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 1 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6550D | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD A8-3820, while the Samsung Exynos 9609 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD A8-3820 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD A8-3820 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 9609 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD A8-3820 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD A8-3820 has 4.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 9609 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm. |
||
| AMD A8-3820 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | -- |
| FM1 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2011 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 85 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz (2.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD A8-3820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A8-3820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD A8-3820
AMD Radeon HD 6550D @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD A8-3820
4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD A8-3820
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD A8-3820 | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
