AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Celeron J1850

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A4-3400 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron J1850
AMD A4-3400 Intel Celeron J1850

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD A4-3400 and the Intel Celeron J1850 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD A4-3400 2 core processor released in Q3/2011 with the Intel Celeron J1850 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2013.
AMD A (112) Family Intel Celeron (165)
AMD A4-3000 (3) CPU group Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17)
1 Generation 6
Llano (K10) Architecture Bay Trail
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A4-3400 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron J1850 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.

AMD A4-3400 Characteristic Intel Celeron J1850
2 Cores 4
2 Threads 4
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
2.70 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD A4-3400 Characteristic Intel Celeron J1850
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

AMD Radeon HD 6410D GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.60 GHz GPU frequency 0.69 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz
3 GPU Generation 7
32 nm Technology 22 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 4
160 Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 6410D GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD A4-3400, while the Intel Celeron J1850 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 21.3 GB/s enabled.

AMD A4-3400 Characteristic Intel Celeron J1850
DDR3-1600 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 8 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 4
-- PCIe Bandwidth 2.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The AMD A4-3400 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP of the Intel Celeron J1850 is 10 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD A4-3400 Characteristic Intel Celeron J1850
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 10 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The AMD A4-3400 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron J1850 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 22 nm.

AMD A4-3400 Characteristic Intel Celeron J1850
32 nm Technology 22 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
FM1 Socket BGA 1170
AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2011 Release date Q3/2013
28 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD A4-3400 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron J1850 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD A4-3400 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 (53%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD A4-3400 (97%)
Intel Celeron J1850 (94%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
349 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
202 (58%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
643 (90%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
718 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
AMD Radeon HD 6410D @ 0.60 GHz
192 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz
51 (26%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
1082 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
940 (87%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
66 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
32 (48%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
125 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
120 (96%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
160 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
502 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
125 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
245 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
243 (100%)
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD A4-3400 Intel Celeron J1850
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Athlon 3000GAMD A4-3400 AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD A4-3400
2. AMD A4-3400Intel Core i5-5200U AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Core i5-5200U
3. AMD A4-5000AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-5000 vs AMD A4-3400
4. AMD FX-4350AMD A4-3400 AMD FX-4350 vs AMD A4-3400
5. AMD Athlon II X4 740AMD A4-3400 AMD Athlon II X4 740 vs AMD A4-3400
6. Intel Core i5-4590AMD A4-3400 Intel Core i5-4590 vs AMD A4-3400
7. Intel Celeron G1820AMD A4-3400 Intel Celeron G1820 vs AMD A4-3400
8. AMD FX-7600PAMD A4-3400 AMD FX-7600P vs AMD A4-3400
9. Intel Celeron J1850Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron J1850 vs Intel Celeron J1900
10. Intel Celeron J1850Intel Celeron J1800 Intel Celeron J1850 vs Intel Celeron J1800


back to index