AMD A4-3300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A4-3300 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 710
AMD A4-3300 HiSilicon Kirin 710

CPU comparison

AMD A4-3300 or HiSilicon Kirin 710 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD A4-3300 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A4-3300 was released in Q3/2011.

The HiSilicon Kirin 710 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 was released in Q3/2018.
AMD A (112) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
AMD A4-3000 (3) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1)
1 Generation 5
Llano (K10) Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A4-3300 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz.

AMD A4-3300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz A-Core 2.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD A4-3300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

AMD Radeon HD 6410D GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
0.44 GHz GPU frequency 0.65 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
3 GPU Generation Bifrost 1
32 nm Technology 12 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 8
160 Shader 128
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
11 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 6410D GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD A4-3300 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 can connect up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

AMD A4-3300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
DDR3-1600 Memory LPDDR4, LPDDR3
Max. Memory 6 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A4-3300 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is 5 W.

AMD A4-3300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 5 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD A4-3300 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 710 cache has a total of 1.00 MB.

AMD A4-3300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
32 nm Technology 12 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions --
FM1 Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2011 Release date Q3/2018
32 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD A4-3300 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 710 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.4 stars (5 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD A4-3300 (83%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD A4-3300 (31%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
266 (83%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
322 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
423 (31%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1384 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
AMD Radeon HD 6410D @ 0.44 GHz
142 (85%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 @ 1.00 GHz
166 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
348 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1206 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
130 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
230 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
224605 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
196747 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
1585 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD A4-3300 AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz
231 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD A4-3300 HiSilicon Kirin 710
Unknown Huawei Honor 8X
Huawei P30 lite

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
4. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
5. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GHiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
9. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 960 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10. Samsung Exynos 9611HiSilicon Kirin 710 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710


back to index